Asus KRPA-U16 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.87% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus KRPA-U16 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK KRPA-U16 Series
Memory236 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190802
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '19 at 13:19
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7302P 16-Core
P0, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 66.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 930
82% 697 Pts
64-Core 2328
144% 2328 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P400
Nvidia(10DE 11BE) 2GB
CLim: 1252 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.87% Terrible
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 10.6
Parallax 9.09
10% 10.6 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 9.93
Splatting 14.9
10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.87%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
372GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1378 881 881 883 883 883 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2530
Write 2,331
Mixed 1,838
SusWrite 965
429% 1,916 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 80.3
262% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 677
DQ Mixed 754
559% 740 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 274%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A4K40CB2-CTD 8x31.9GB
8 of 16 slots used
255GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
235% Outstanding
MC Read 103
MC Write 79.4
MC Mixed 113
281% 98.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 32.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 235%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback