MSI MS-16GA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 0NC/GE60 0ND
MotherboardMSI MS-16GA  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '20 at 11:37
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 88
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 430
47% 374 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
MSI(1462 10C7) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 7.46
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.78 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.74
4% 5.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 285 293 294 295 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 471
Write 445
Mixed 364
SusWrite 297
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 37.1
117% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 351
267% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 124%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 960GB
123GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.2% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 25.8
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 29.4
22% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 6.3
1,145% 7.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2S4G64CB8HG5N-DI 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16GA Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $377WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback