HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 06 '19 at 15:12
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 46
2-Core 75.8
45% 66.3 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 142
16% 126 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
HP(103C 179D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1501.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Lighting 4.83
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.03
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 4.83
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 323 340 354 342 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 382
Write 371
Mixed 331
SusWrite 337
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 34.1
108% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 313
238% 322 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 129%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
422GB free
Firmware: JA0OA480
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 35 37 45 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 6
Write 41.2
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 36.7
17% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 57%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 960GB
679GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 21 22 21 23 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 18
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 21.5
15% 19.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 4
617% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback