Asus Rampage II GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Rampage II GENE  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateAug 12 '20 at 02:23
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 930-$157
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 142
60% 99.4 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 363
37% 301 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 37.2
32% 35.7 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 36.2
31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 1TB SSD 1TB
555GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1230A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 91 88 90 91 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.9% Below average
Read 225
Write 208
Mixed 201
SusWrite 82.9
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 18.7
78% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.5
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 23.3
26% 42 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 77 92 89 90 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49% Average
Read 84.9
Write 108
Mixed 59.5
SusWrite 84.6
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
190% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 78 84 90 92 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 52.4
Write 97.8
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 83.2
53% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
154% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 64%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
14GB free
Firmware: 080.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 78 89 88 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 85.6
Write 86.1
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 82.8
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 87%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
849GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 79 84 91 93 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 79.1
Write 94.4
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 83.8
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.3
100% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 72%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
464GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 95 96 96 98 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 89
Write 88.8
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 95.4
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 1TB
136GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 51.8
Write 60.1
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 53
69% 50.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 13.2
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Rampage II GENE Builds (Compare 278 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Rampage II GENE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $245
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback