Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171027
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 19:19
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 249
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 724
74% 597 Pts
64-Core 742
46% 742 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
112% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 163
Parallax 164
125% 160 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 146
Splatting 105
97% 119 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 960GB-$90
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33110RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 169 198 170 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 448
Write 394
Mixed 374
SusWrite 157
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 10.2
48% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 12.8
62% 136 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 78%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$34
97GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 335 343 357 351 357 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Read 478
Write 355
Mixed 248
SusWrite 348
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 15.9
117% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 90.7
118% 208 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$79
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 130 133 133 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 81.3
Write 137
Mixed 66
SusWrite 131
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 90%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
271GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 86 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 88.6
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 87.4
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 85%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
882GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 117 118 118 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 85.1
Write 102
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 114
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 68%
Jmicron H/W RAID5 32TB
13TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.9 7.5 7.7 7.5 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 9
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 7.6
7% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.25%
Great: 125%
Jmicron Generic DISK00 24TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 151 167 202 205 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 4% Great: 52%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
4.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 71 49 93 102 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 114
Write 106
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 81.7
62% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 21.7
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 21.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Ultra Gaming - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $743
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback