MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C36
MotherboardMSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime4.7 Days
Run DateMar 16 '20 at 08:00
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 301
94% 176 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,194
105% 893 Pts
64-Core 2870
178% 2870 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 137
Reflection 128
Parallax 143
112% 136 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 132
Splatting 104
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1295 1458 1325 876 91 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 1,567
Mixed 1,081
SusWrite 859
278% 1,235 MB/s
4K Read 58.5
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 82.4
296% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 623
DQ Write 911
DQ Mixed 270
344% 601 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 235%
Great: 255%
WD Blue 3D 2TB-$215
1TB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 426 424 428 433 438 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Read 418
Write 428
Mixed 303
SusWrite 428
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 36.5
134% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 191
143% 191 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 118%
WD WD120EMFZ-11A6JA0 12TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 199 197 191 191 198 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 106 103 106 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 128
Write 140
Mixed 82.5
SusWrite 105
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.2
312% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 111 116 117 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64% Good
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 69
SusWrite 114
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
227% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 99%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$235
1TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 185 189 187 184 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 185
Mixed 105
SusWrite 184
121% 165 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.1
317% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 116 123 120 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 100
Write 97.5
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 116
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
232% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 99%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
985GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 164 180 180 191 188 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 130
Write 144
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 183
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
295% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 105%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
812GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 127 123 127 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 141
Write 148
Mixed 74
SusWrite 125
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
223% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 99%
Jmicron H/W RAID5 32TB
9.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 202 215 221 215 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 18.8
Mixed 122
SusWrite 211
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
513% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 125%
Great: 125%
Jmicron H/W RAID5 32TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 209 214 205 192 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 21.5
Mixed 133
SusWrite 208
108% 146 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
510% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 124%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 32.1
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 30.6
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36) Builds (Compare 344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 209%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRESTIGE X570 CREATION (MS-7C36)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $1,532
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback