Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics82% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory121.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateJul 28 '20 at 07:56
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 98.9
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 709
63% 533 Pts
64-Core 1,746
108% 1,746 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3773) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 108
Parallax 93.2
83% 101 fps
MRender 95
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 98.8
80% 97.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
769GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 449 443 438 438 436 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 435
Mixed 406
SusWrite 438
98% 433 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 29.9
106% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 350
263% 350 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 5.5TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 332 334 335 333 334 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 343
Write 302
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 332
195% 269 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.5
424% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 194%
Great: 240%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
175GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 107 112 110 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 146
Write 105
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 109
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
83GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 90 89 88 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 90.2
Write 66.1
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 88
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 101%
KINGSTON SA400S37120G 120GB
15GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 30
Write 25.6
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 23.2
36% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 6.2
441% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 113%
WDC WD30 EZRX-22D8PB0 3TB
8GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 2.9 2.9 2.9 2.9 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 30.2
Write 24.9
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 3.3
25% 20 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 16x8GB
16 of 16 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 29.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 6.9
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback