HP 200-5120br

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 200-5120br  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AA2
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 16 '20 at 19:27
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Memory 52.8
1-Core 18.1
2-Core 41.6
26% 37.5 Pts
4-Core 40.4
8-Core 33.1
5% 36.8 Pts
64-Core 20.1
1% 20.1 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 2AA2)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.5% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.56 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.74
0% 0.56 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.5%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3750528AS 750GB-$65
626GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 32 62 102 103 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 77
Write 93.5
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 79.2
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 65%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 4GB
2GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 8.8 9.5 9.9 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
4.99% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 6.8
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 9.6
10% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.99%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.33% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.4
MC Mixed 3
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2
6% 2.17 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 200-5120br Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 200-5120br

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback