Hp-pavilion VT653AA-ABM 200-5025la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHp-pavilion VT653AA-ABM 200-5025la  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard Boma
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 21:44
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 39.6
1-Core 34.6
2-Core 77.4
30% 50.5 Pts
4-Core 66.3
8-Core 62
9% 64.2 Pts
64-Core 58.1
4% 58.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset
HP(103C 2AA2)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver.
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
0.41% Terrible
Lighting 0.57
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.54 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.43
Splatting 0.74
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.41%
Great: 2%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$87
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP35
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 644
Write 15.2
Mixed 36.3
167% 232 MB/s
4K Read 180
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.4
7,799% 61.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 69%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
8.85% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 3
8% 2.87 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.6
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical VT653AA-ABM 200-5025la Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: Hp-pavilion VT653AA-ABM 200-5025la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $59
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback