Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac14,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac14,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27ADBB7B4CEE8E61
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200412
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 12 '20 at 18:14
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$118
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 378
53% 394 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 775M
Apple(106B 0120) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 24.1
Parallax 30.5
20% 26.6 fps
MRender 35
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 22.6
23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 497GB
404GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 372 354 365 364 350 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 366
Write 366
Mixed 335
SusWrite 361
81% 357 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 25.5
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 107
84% 114 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 128%
Apple HDD WD10EZES-40UFAA0 1TB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3D03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 89 71 88 94 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 102
Write 101
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 82
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53%
Great: 108%
FLASH Drive SM_USB20 16GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.6 7 6.9 7.2 6.7 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
8.58% Terrible
Read 35.8
Write 4.2
Mixed 7.8
SusWrite 6.8
14% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 8.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
30% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.58%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 16.7
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,2 Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac14,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback