Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac14,2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac14,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-27ADBB7B4CEE8E61
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 16:48
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$118
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 86.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 402
54% 403 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 775M
Apple(106B 0120) 2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
20% Poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 31.9
18% 27.4 fps
MRender 35.3
Gravity 31
Splatting 23.9
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA7J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 101 82 97 96 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 145
Write 130
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 104
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314736453220 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,2 Builds (Compare 317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac14,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback