PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 3010 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 3010 (all builds) |
Memory | 8.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130131 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 16 '20 at 09:59 |
Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
Run User | MYS-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
57.6%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 155 59 61 17 45 MB/s
|
30.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
352GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 26 26 MB/s
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 859B CT102464BA160B.C16 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 2,026x |
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 549x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 347x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 1,055x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 298x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 262x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |