PDS Vector SW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemPDS Vector SW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ67SW
Memory7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJun 12 '20 at 10:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User QAT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 328
44% 330 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 368F) 2GB
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.5% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 43.5
Parallax 38.6
32% 40.2 fps
MRender 39.5
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 36.2
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 104 131 136 150 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 134
Write 126
Mixed 46
SusWrite 123
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 184%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1GB
0GB free, PID 0723
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.27% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 1.6
4% 3.78 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.27%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF Adata AD63I1B0823EV Adata AD63I1B0823EV 12GB
1600, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 8.9
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vector SW Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: PDS Vector SW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback