Today's hottest deals

Asus P9D WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9D WS  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140605
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '22 at 20:23
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4360-$87
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 81.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 181
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 283
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W5000
Dell(1028 0B06) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 28
Parallax 22.3
14% 22.4 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 20.4
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
882GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 316 321 321 314 318 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 331
Write 362
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 311
187% 260 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
198% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 184%
Great: 184%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5273DH0-CH9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 20
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9D WS Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P9D WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $199
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback