Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	24 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200401
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '20 at 04:27
Run Duration	372 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210 294,959 User benchmarks, average bench 84% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 80.6 1-Core 151 2-Core 281 93% 171 Pts	4-Core 516 8-Core 874 84% 695 Pts	64-Core 1,046 65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5500-XT-$217 72,993 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Gigabyte(1458 2318) ≥ 4GB Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.7% Above average	Lighting 64.8 Reflection 50.5 Parallax 97 53% 70.8 fps	MRender 48.4 Gravity 66.4 Splatting 64.2 50% 59.7 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 481GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 826 101 92 24 12 165 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	160% Outstanding	Read 1,327 Write 1,194 Mixed 879 SusWrite 203 201% 901 MB/s	4K Read 48.1 4K Write 111 4K Mixed 61.8 211% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 579 DQ Write 745 DQ Mixed 272 314% 532 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 255%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 549GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 88.5 Write 89.2 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 89 109% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.2 40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 380GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 86 85 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 85.2 Write 76.8 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 85.5 104% 77.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.8 258% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 59%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 917GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 59 64 66 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 89 Write 87 Mixed 70.1 SusWrite 62.8 103% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1.3 110% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 85 83 85 84 83 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 134 Write 141 Mixed 100 SusWrite 83.6 153% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 1.1 193% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 74%
WDC WD80 EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 7.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 164 156 166 162 161 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 182 Write 180 Mixed 109 SusWrite 160 211% 158 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 1.1 204% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 74%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 144 148 150 148 152 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 131 Write 134 Mixed 104 SusWrite 148 177% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 641GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.4 7.6 3.9 5.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	29% Poor	Read 135 Write 139 Mixed 108 SusWrite 5.3 124% 96.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 65%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.3 7.6 4 5.1 2.3 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	29% Poor	Read 138 Write 143 Mixed 114 SusWrite 5.2 128% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 65%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 350GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 148 152 152 151 153 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	59.7% Above average	Read 158 Write 125 Mixed 85.9 SusWrite 151 172% 130 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 59.7% Great: 62%
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 450GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 73 72 72 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 110 Write 109 Mixed 88.7 SusWrite 72.2 127% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 47%
WDC WD40 EMRX-82UZ0N0 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 789GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 133 140 139 138 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 121 Write 128 Mixed 104 SusWrite 137 168% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 63%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 831GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 70 76 76 76 76 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 98.9 Write 99.7 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 73.9 119% 88.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 76 76 76 77 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 146 Write 152 Mixed 119 SusWrite 74.3 163% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 66%
TOSHIBA MG03ACA400 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 146 148 147 145 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	Read 122 Write 124 Mixed 61.6 SusWrite 144 153% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.8 119% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
GEIL CL16-18-18 D4-3200 4x8GB 561 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 37.7 96% 33.6 GB/s	SC Read 25.8 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 33.9 78% 27.5 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,655x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,266x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,416x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,239x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,078x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	726x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,033

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16