Acer Extensa 5630

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Extensa 5630  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Homa
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090811
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 13:38
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7500-$90
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
30% Poor
Memory 57.1
1-Core 9.9
2-Core 21.2
24% 29.4 Pts
4-Core 19.2
8-Core 23.6
3% 21.4 Pts
64-Core 21
1% 21 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Acer(1025 013C)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.43
Reflection 0.35
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.4 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.17
Splatting 0.52
0% 0.37 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.34%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AC101C4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 7.9 19 19 25 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 19
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 16.5
10% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
20% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 47%
WD Elements 250GB
94GB free
Firmware: 8101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 19 15 17 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 13
Mixed 11.5
SusWrite 14.6
10% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
60% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.77 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 2.3
SC Mixed 0.6
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 5630 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 5630

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback