HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 31 '18 at 20:38
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 189
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 374
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 371
23% 371 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 1616 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.1
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 20
16% 19.1 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 22.3
17% 20.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 232 234 237 238 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.2% Good
Read 256
Write 236
Mixed 234
SusWrite 226
54% 238 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 33.6
113% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 180
141% 194 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
323GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 111 110 110 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 77
SusWrite 109
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 66%
Great: 69%
WD Elements 250GB
45GB free
Firmware: 8102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 86 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 94.2
Write 87.7
Mixed 66
SusWrite 84.8
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback