PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus Z170-A (all builds) |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150714 |
Uptime | 11 Days |
Run Date | Jun 02 '20 at 00:58 |
Run Duration | 282 Seconds |
Run User | ZAF-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.3%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
|
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 778 617 718 767 761 782 MB/s
|
129%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 236 272 285 286 291 MB/s
|
72.2%
Very good
|
|||
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
463GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 79 78 77 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
|||
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64
179GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 115 119 120 120 119 MB/s
|
69.6%
Good
|
|||
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$185
9.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 187 216 231 229 230 MB/s
|
||||
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
155GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.2 5.4 9.5 4.8 4.8 MB/s
|
6.33%
Terrible
|
|||
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
53GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 1.3 0.6 1 0.3 0.3 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
253GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s
|
6.09%
Terrible
|
|||
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
102GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 33 28 33 34 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
67%
Good
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $127Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 4,117x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $90Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 2,515x |
Core i7-6700Intel $134Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 672x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 1,404x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 859x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 779x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $732 |