Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime11 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 00:58
Run Duration282 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$90
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Memory 62.4
1-Core 35
2-Core 75.6
37% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 439
46% 371 Pts
64-Core 429
27% 429 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 66.6
52% 66.5 fps
MRender 73.6
Gravity 64.7
Splatting 54.9
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$80
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 778 617 718 767 761 782 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,080
Write 1,049
Mixed 857
SusWrite 737
209% 931 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 26.5
85% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 574
363% 410 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 129%
Great: 346%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 236 272 285 286 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 413
Write 365
Mixed 344
SusWrite 281
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 23
83% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 290
218% 290 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 124%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
463GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 79 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 78
Write 76.2
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 76.7
52% 71.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 51%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64
179GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 115 119 120 120 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 123
Write 119
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 119
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$185
9.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 187 216 231 229 230 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 120%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
155GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.2 5.4 9.5 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.33% Terrible
Read 21.3
Write 22
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 6
22% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.33%
Great: 32%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
53GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 1.3 0.6 1 0.3 0.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 31.7
Write 30.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 0.6
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 20%
WDC WD80 EFZX-68UW8N0 8TB
253GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.09% Terrible
Read 22
Write 19.5
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 0.3
20% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.09%
Great: 14%
ST8000AS 0002-1NA17Z 8TB
102GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 31 33 28 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.6% Very poor
Read 19.7
Write 20.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 32
33% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 27%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
67% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 25.1
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 67%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 9,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $187

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $732
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback