Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive123% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z170-P  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160607
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 13:34
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 65%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$246
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 229
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 448
58% 439 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
61.6% Good
Lighting 76.6
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 67.9
62% 74.1 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 72.5
Splatting 74.9
60% 72.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
355GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 448 460 468 375 283 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 467
Mixed 436
SusWrite 408
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 59.3
206% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 313
236% 318 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
111GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 109 106 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 350
Write 141
Mixed 193
SusWrite 107
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 42.4
170% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 156
120% 164 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 82%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
357GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 9.9 10 10 8.4 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 2
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 9.6
6% 4.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 20%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB
192GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 21.8
Write 23
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 0.3
20% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
24% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 20%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
1GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.3
Write 29.2
Mixed 23.8
34% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 21%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
34GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 19 20 16 21 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
Read 27.5
Write 27.5
Mixed 25
SusWrite 20.1
34% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB
340GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 34.2
Mixed 27
SusWrite 37.9
46% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GB-$60
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 24.6
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-P Builds (Compare 4,459 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-P - $119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $624
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback