Asrock Z270 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '17 at 04:06
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 190
77% 131 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 293
39% 291 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
MSI(1462 2441) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 16.2
16% 16.7 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 12.8
Splatting 19
12% 14.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXZ7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,337
Write 1,383
Mixed 1,753
404% 1,824 MB/s
4K Read 54.5
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 66.2
240% 85.8 MB/s
DQ Read 497
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 179
192% 325 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 270%
Great: 292%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
884GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 148
Mixed 116
110% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.59
4K Mixed 0.32
139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 114%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB
195GB free, PID 01f0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.1% Below average
Read 118
Write 79.9
Mixed 94.7
120% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.19
25% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 49%
Compact Flash Card 1GB
1GB free, PID null
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
4.28% Terrible
Read 14.6
Write 5.39
Mixed 7.72
10% 9.24 MB/s
4K Read 3.78
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.03
16% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.28%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Pro4 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $828
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback