HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8307
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 22:29
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 124
2-Core 213
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 647
64% 524 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 131
Parallax 137
109% 134 fps
MRender 164
Gravity 116
Splatting 94.8
99% 125 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 105%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1555 943 796 796 798 797 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,363
Write 2,142
Mixed 1,664
SusWrite 947
398% 1,779 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 77.1
262% 90 MB/s
DQ Read 1,181
DQ Write 971
DQ Mixed 1,084
810% 1,079 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 281%
Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
538GB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 142 142 143 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 128
Write 92.7
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 142
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 145 152 147 154 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 124
Write 142
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 150
87% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 143 143 147 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74% Very good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 49
SusWrite 143
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
26% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74%
Great: 90%
ASMT 2105 320GB
297GB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 86 85 86 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 84
Mixed 55
SusWrite 85.1
104% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC KHX2400C15/8G Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.7
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 19.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback