Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 4157W5C (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO LENOVO
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090403
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 29 '20 at 13:52
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3520-$230 6,508 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	67.2% Good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 71.7 2-Core 130 62% 97.9 Pts	4-Core 230 8-Core 343 36% 287 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 14.5 Parallax 18.1 16% 17.2 fps	MRender 16 Gravity 18.8 Splatting 20 15% 18.3 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 202 225 221 224 223 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.9% Above average	Read 239 Write 226 Mixed 222 SusWrite 205 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 16.3 4K Write 42.7 4K Mixed 24.8 79% 27.9 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 140 109% 151 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 125%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$29 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 261GB free Firmware: ST6OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 89 89 89 89 89 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Read 112 Write 111 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 88.3 67% 91.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 61%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 164GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 79 80 81 81 82 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 73.5 Write 81 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 78.9 52% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 57%
WD 5000AAK External 500GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 407GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 24 25 24 25 24 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 30.3 Write 25 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 23.7 34% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 20%
Maxtor 3200 400GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 88GB free, PID 3200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 14 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 20.8 26% 20.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 16%
Generic USB CF Reader 1GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 0GB free, PID 0330 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	2.31% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 2.5 Mixed 3.7 SusWrite 2.7 5% 3.85 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 16% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.31% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 133 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.5% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 11 34% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 10.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370

Lenovo 4157W5C

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)