Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P5K

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P5K (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20081014
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '19 at 10:41
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 54.7 34% 48.5 Pts	4-Core 101 8-Core 106 14% 104 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI HD 3650 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 01DA) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 4.31 Parallax 1.19 2% 2.64 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.74 2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 44 39 32 32 31 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.6% Average	Read 206 Write 207 Mixed 196 SusWrite 38.6 36% 162 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 41.9 4K Mixed 31.7 104% 33.7 MB/s	DQ Read 34.4 DQ Write 70.9 DQ Mixed 44.7 36% 50 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$35 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 50GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 120 118 119 122 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 87.8 Write 89.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 119 57% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$55 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 176GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 122 121 110 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 108 Write 111 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 118 67% 92.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 144GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 89 90 108 113 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 56 Write 90.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 97.1 47% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 76% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 103%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB 694 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 597GB free, PID 61b6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 24.5 Write 25.5 Mixed 22 SusWrite 25 33% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 76% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 51%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 500GB 1,370 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 31GB free, PID 3000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 4 Mixed 10 SusWrite 20.5 19% 16.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 47% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 17%
Generic USB CF Reader 1GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 0330 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	6.78% Terrible	Read 18 Write 12 Mixed 11.8 SusWrite 11.1 17% 13.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 33% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.78% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 4.2 MC Mixed 4.1 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5K Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K - $399

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $50Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	92x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	34x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $90Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	12x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
840 Evo 120GBSamsung $85Bench 91%, 104,444 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	155x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	59x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $564

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370