MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 12:19
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 43.6
2-Core 121
48% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 300
34% 264 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Lighting 38.3
Reflection 30.1
Parallax 36.7
31% 35 fps
MRender 37.2
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 35.5
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 158 139 146 148 142 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 367
Write 243
Mixed 248
SusWrite 151
56% 252 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 26.8
92% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 230
176% 242 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 32 32 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 32.2
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 32.5
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 107%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
731GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 93 93 94 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 78.8
Write 79.5
Mixed 66
SusWrite 92.4
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
93GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 63 63 63 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 62.2
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 62.2
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1
161% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 68%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
345GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 84 85 85 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 78
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 83.5
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 67%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 23 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 29
Write 26
Mixed 24
SusWrite 24.7
35% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 45%
WDC WD10 EARS-22Y5B1 1TB
101GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.4 3.4 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.5% Terrible
Read 25.8
Write 17.5
Mixed 16
SusWrite 3.3
19% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
26% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.5%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL10-10-10 D3-1866 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38.8% Below average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 13
MC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 8
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 GAMING (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 2,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970 GAMING (MS-7693)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback