Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20160

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemLenovo 20160  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20160
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 12:24
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 157
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 207
28% 208 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5003) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.58% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 2.69
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.15 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.57
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.58%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$25
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 52 38 63 61 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 72.3
Write 67
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 54.5
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 13.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20160 Builds (Compare 63 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback