Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Presario CQ57 Notebook PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3577
Memory	3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '18 at 07:58
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-300 APU-$120 7,672 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 45.4 1-Core 16.1 2-Core 29.9 22% 30.5 Pts	4-Core 21.5 8-Core 23 3% 22.2 Pts	64-Core 30 2% 30 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 37%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 229 159 228 244 248 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 402 Write 297 Mixed 338 SusWrite 223 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 11 4K Mixed 9.6 32% 9.83 MB/s	DQ Read 64.4 DQ Write 37.5 DQ Mixed 48.2 37% 50 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 6GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.2% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.8 MC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.43 GB/s	Latency 179 22% 179 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-300 APUAMD $120Bench 23%, 7,672 samples	32x
Celeron B800IntelBench 40%, 2,662 samples	29x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	21x

GPU
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	74x
Radeon HD 6310AMDBench 1%, 13,166 samples	33x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	12x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	8x
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	6x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $148

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16