Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory240GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 240GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory228 GB free of 240 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 04:45
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
None, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 164
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 603
54% 457 Pts
64-Core 2,161
134% 2,161 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 376GB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 384 389 384 386 386 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 91%
Samsung MZ7LM960 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: 0M3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 415 417 413 415 414 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 430
Write 417
Mixed 355
SusWrite 414
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 20.1
65% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 225
167% 219 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 112%
Samsung MZ7LM960 960GB
884GB free
Firmware: 0M3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 409 412 408 410 408 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
66.4% Good
Read 421
Write 414
Mixed 346
SusWrite 408
90% 397 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 18.9
63% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 68.1
DQ Mixed 129
91% 118 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 67GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
3968, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
132% Outstanding
MC Read 62.6
MC Write 50.6
MC Mixed 50.7
156% 54.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 132%
Great: 412%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback