bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive28.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 10 '22 at 16:07
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 67.8
1-Core 83.6
2-Core 161
60% 104 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 594
55% 457 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 64%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 136GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 102 103 105 123 124 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.4% Poor
Read 202
Write 186
Mixed 203
SusWrite 113
40% 176 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 12.9
38% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 22.6
18% 25.2 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 77%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 69GB
59GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 73 82 71 76 75 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.2% Poor
Read 198
Write 224
Mixed 218
SusWrite 76.5
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 7.9
26% 7.83 MB/s
DQ Read 36.5
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 36.3
27% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None 32GB
0, 0 MHz
1024, 31744 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 49.1
MC Mixed 46.5
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.2
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 119%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback