Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 11:29
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 92.3
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 443
51% 399 Pts
64-Core 436
27% 436 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000
HP(103C 176C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver:
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
8.53% Terrible
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 12.3
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 9.33
Gravity 9.1
Splatting 13.6
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.53%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 121 77 66 165 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
63% Good
Read 420
Write 401
Mixed 348
SusWrite 134
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 25.8
84% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 159
147% 226 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63%
Great: 89%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
142GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 116 117 117 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 62
SusWrite 117
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback