Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '19 at 20:17
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3380M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 201
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro M4000
HP(103C 176C) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.200.0.0
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 6.19
Parallax 6.97
4% 6.15 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 5.33
Splatting 5.7
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
575GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 75.9
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
690GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 112 110 112 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64% Good
Read 111
Write 108
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 112
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback