Asus Z87-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z87-PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140818
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 18 '20 at 23:59
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1246 v3-$200
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 96.8
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
85% 147 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 595
63% 503 Pts
64-Core 594
37% 594 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 1820 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 95
57% 77.8 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 70.7
Splatting 56.2
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram C50 120GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 173 216 59 117 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 458
Write 229
Mixed 214
SusWrite 135
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 15.9
76% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 59.3
72% 124 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 71%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$88
2TB free
Firmware: MKAOAAM0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 124 125 125 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 119
Write 119
Mixed 65
SusWrite 119
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 2000 C10 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1960 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 23.8
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 50.9
78% 50.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87-PRO Builds (Compare 2,561 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Z87-PRO - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback