ADD TO PC
BUILD

Eurocom Panther 4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Eurocom Panther 4.0 (all builds)
Motherboard	EUROCOM Panther 4.0
Memory	20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130320
Uptime	9.6 Days
Run Date	May 16 '20 at 19:54
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3970X-$217 2,677 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 89 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 196 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 597 59% 480 Pts	64-Core 696 43% 696 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680M 1,365 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Clevo(1558 0270) ≥ 4GB CLim: 758 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 20.9 Parallax 28 19% 24.2 fps	MRender 28.1 Gravity 28.7 Splatting 22.7 21% 26.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 133 151 157 169 155 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59.5% Above average	Read 238 Write 178 Mixed 174 SusWrite 153 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 25.2 4K Write 49.9 4K Mixed 31.9 106% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 145 116% 163 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 94%
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB 7,786 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 428GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 69 71 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 52.8 Write 53.5 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 69.9 44% 58.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.4 158% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 63%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 161GB free Firmware: SM11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 95 95 95 93 96 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 70.3 Write 71 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 94.9 53% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.9 356% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 65%
silicon-power 2GB 68 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 3623 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.2 6.7 6.7 6.5 6.7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	7.21% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 6.5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6.2 12% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 39% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.21% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	MC Read 37.6 MC Write 36.8 MC Mixed 33.5 103% 36 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 11.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 68.5 58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback