Asus P8Z68-V LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive0.62% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LE  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130909
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 14:20
Run Duration413 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 190
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 444
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
MSI(1462 2775) 3GB
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 0
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 61.9
0% 31.4 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 50.1
Splatting 40.5
33% 40 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 240GB
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 12 8.6 11 6.5 7 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
0.62% Terrible
Read 1.5
Write 18.3
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 9
2% 7.57 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 94%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$75
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 171 170 173 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 165
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 170
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 108%
ST1000LM 024 HN-M101MBB 1TB
707GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 38 33 47 32 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 7.3
Write 13.3
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 36.2
24% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0
14% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-015.A00LF 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LE Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $463
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback