MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200507
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 05:16
Run Duration390 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 152
2-Core 302
98% 181 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,140
104% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,502
93% 1,502 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 101%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Gigabyte(1458 22ED) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1287 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 44.7
27% 36.4 fps
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 34.5
30% 33.7 fps
Poor: 19% Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,001
Write 1,433
Mixed 660
300% 1,365 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 149
4K Mixed 59.6
218% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,178
DQ Write 931
DQ Mixed 952
740% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
St5000dm 000-1FK178 5TB
10GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 56 62 66 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Read 73.8
Write 79
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 65.1
17% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
7% 3.53 MB/s
DQ Read 1
DQ Write 3.6
DQ Mixed 2.1
2% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 19%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
5GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 42
Write 93.2
Mixed 78.5
54% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 0.9
322% 4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 2.3
DQ Mixed 1.9
18% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
6GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 131
Write 126
Mixed 38.5
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.8
278% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
33GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 42 82 84 86 89 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
13GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 88 71 69 58 62 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
9GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 83 69 72 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 164
Write 129
Mixed 83.7
SusWrite 81.2
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS5C3030ALA630 3TB-$124
14GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 67 68 68 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 60.2
Write 65
Mixed 42
SusWrite 69.1
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 66%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
7GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 43 59 70 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 87.5
Write 89.5
Mixed 94.7
SusWrite 68.9
64% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.8
256% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 87%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
57GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 26 24 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 30
Write 29.7
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 26.2
39% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.4
200% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 25A3 8TB
6GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 38.2
Write 39.5
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 27.3
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.3
220% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 96%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
4GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 14 9.8 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
7.16% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 21
Mixed 14
SusWrite 11.3
21% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.16%
Great: 48%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.26% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 35
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 1.1
31% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
59% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 6.26%
Great: 84%
HGST HMS 5C4040BLE640 4TB
16GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 6.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.13% Terrible
Read 7
Write 20.7
Mixed 11
SusWrite 1.4
14% 10 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
48% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 38%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
15GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 7.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.65% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 28
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 1.7
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 6.65%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3533 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 35.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 36
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 89%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,038
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback