Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 97% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asrock X99M Killer/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 12 '20 at 01:26
Run Duration	301 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 118 2-Core 232 80% 144 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 749 76% 613 Pts	64-Core 922 57% 922 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 143 Reflection 149 Parallax 157 117% 150 fps	MRender 188 Gravity 135 Splatting 107 113% 143 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 310GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 465 462 456 430 346 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 455 Mixed 431 SusWrite 439 102% 451 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 52.8 173% 59.7 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 239 190% 262 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 371GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 450 430 370 387 353 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 482 Write 454 Mixed 431 SusWrite 409 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 85.7 4K Mixed 48 161% 56.5 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 49 91% 179 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 162GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1318 308 307 308 308 307 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 1,944 Write 1,508 Mixed 704 SusWrite 476 256% 1,158 MB/s	4K Read 44.2 4K Write 205 4K Mixed 56.5 248% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,058 DQ Write 1,193 DQ Mixed 719 654% 990 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 236%
WD easystore 25FB 10TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 5.5TB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	Read 30.7 Write 25.3 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 13.4 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1 186% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 99%
HITACHI HUS724040ALE640 4TB 268GB free, PID 0578 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.8% Very poor	Read 31 Write 26 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 13.7 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 98% 1.2 MB/s

WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 13 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 24.7 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 13.6 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 54%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 431GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 26 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 19.4 33% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 54%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 439GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 26.3 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 19.3 34% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$104 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67% Good	MC Read 27.3 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 22 70% 24.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 18 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	24x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	14x
Core i7-5930KIntel $143Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	11x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $226Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	10x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x
NVME SSD 256GBNetacBench 178%, 1,034 samples	4x
750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GBIntel $550Bench 186%, 8,641 samples	4x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $90Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	7x
HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 4x4GBKingstonBench 91%, 1,174 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 113% - Outstanding

Total price: $539

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363