Asus PRIME B350M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350M-A  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 14:27
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 202
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 361
8-Core 615
59% 488 Pts
64-Core 836
52% 836 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61% Good
Lighting 75.7
Reflection 75
Parallax 71.8
62% 74.1 fps
MRender 72.7
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 73.3
60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$68
373GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 879 434 439 437 439 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1563
Write 1,606
Mixed 1,270
SusWrite 512
277% 1,238 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 61.6
209% 74.1 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 724
525% 685 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 188%
Great: 237%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
110GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 115
72% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 1170 2TB
6GB free, PID 1170
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 76.1
121% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 50%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
27GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 73 78 69 45 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 128
Write 120
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 63.4
123% 95 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.7
319% 4.4 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 9.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
352% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 89%
ST2000DM 005-2CW102 2TB
12GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.2 0 0.4 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 106
Write 139
Mixed 91.1
SusWrite 5.6
112% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
44% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 74%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
9GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 78 39 17 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 132
Write 125
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 60.1
129% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 62%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB
9GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 0.9 0.3 31 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 111
Write 118
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 23.8
101% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5702-085.A00G 9905678-065.A00G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.3% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350M-A Builds (Compare 2,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350M-A - $76

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $382
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback