Asrock AB350M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock AB350M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 07 '20 at 13:20
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 80
1-Core 122
2-Core 230
80% 144 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 688
66% 545 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 150
Reflection 142
Parallax 147
122% 146 fps
MRender 173
Gravity 125
Splatting 102
106% 134 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 395 393 286 284 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 442
Mixed 321
SusWrite 339
90% 401 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 35.8
124% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 253
215% 312 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 123%
Samsung PM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
140GB free
Firmware: BXV77D0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 297 297 297 297 297 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 941
Write 302
Mixed 337
SusWrite 297
103% 469 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 33.6
147% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 924
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 416
359% 549 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 127%
Great: 147%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
511GB free
Firmware: AX1E1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 89 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 93.5
Write 76.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 89.8
53% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 62%
Asmt 2115 512GB
119GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 10% Great: 20%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 138 135 140 140 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 81.2
Write 130
Mixed 68
SusWrite 135
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
229% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 90%
Generic Storage Device 0GB
0GB free, PID 1336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Read 2.5
Write 1.2
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 1.3
2% 1.67 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 28.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24.3
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,429 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M Pro4 - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $465
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback