Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus IV Extreme-Z  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110527
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 00:06
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 96.7
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 490
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 503
31% 503 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Asus(1043 03BE) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 26.4
26% 29.3 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 19.9
19% 23.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 456
Mixed 396
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 55.7
185% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 366
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
42GB free
Firmware: MN6OA5C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 34 33 33 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 6
Write 37.4
Mixed 5
SusWrite 32.9
15% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 85%
Asmt 2115 512GB
178GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 30
Mixed 30.7
SusWrite 30.2
23% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 7.4
1,244% 7.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
101GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 124 126 134 129 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 110
Write 71.2
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 126
69% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.4
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus IV Extreme-Z Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus Maximus IV Extreme-Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback