Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130618
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 21:21
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 109
53% 83.3 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 228
27% 206 Pts
64-Core 231
14% 231 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1230 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.02
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.5% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 60.1
35% 54.4 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 45.2
Splatting 50.1
42% 51.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 129 128 128 70 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 303
Write 289
Mixed 253
SusWrite 115
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 23
82% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 56.4
DQ Mixed 30
26% 38 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 98%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
342GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 89 90 90 90 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 86.2
Write 77.5
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 88.9
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 54%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL10- F3-12800CL9-4 12GB
667, 800 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.2% Below average
MC Read 12.7
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.2
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback