Today's hottest deals

Asrock X570 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics55.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '20 at 23:30
Run Duration237 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$314
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 82.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 298
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,156
103% 873 Pts
64-Core 1,710
106% 1,710 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.3
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 88.7
57% 75.9 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 56.6
53% 65.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$185
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,974
Write 3,375
Mixed 2,277
573% 2,542 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 90.2
313% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,368
DQ Write 963
DQ Mixed 1,087
833% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
Pcie SSD 1TB
23GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,055
Write 580
Mixed 580
162% 738 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 33.6
162% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 74.2
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 58.3
98% 180 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 284%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
21GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 507
Write 451
Mixed 449
105% 469 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 97.7
4K Mixed 56.5
187% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 205
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
10GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 106 95 94 95 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 85.7
Write 74.2
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 98.1
51% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 0.6
237% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
29GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 142 146 152 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
259GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 156 162 168 168 159 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 144
Write 158
Mixed 85
SusWrite 162
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.8
331% 3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 93%
WD easystore 25FB 14TB
12TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 215 203 218 207 214 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 196
Mixed 195
SusWrite 210
274% 198 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 1.4
410% 7.13 MB/s
DQ Read 0.9
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 1.8
374% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE8G4D36BEEAK.M8FE3 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3734 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 50.5
MC Write 47.5
MC Mixed 47.9
139% 48.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 38
86% 30.1 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Taichi Builds (Compare 2,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Taichi - $217

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback