Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-M (all builds)
Memory	13.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130103
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 29 '20 at 19:43
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Memory 93 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 175 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 405 8-Core 407 54% 406 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100 111,509 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Asus(1043 8569) 2GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 33.8 Reflection 33.4 Parallax 33.7 28% 33.6 fps	MRender 36.6 Gravity 30.9 Splatting 31.9 27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 266GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 243 242 233 230 229 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	84.5% Excellent	Read 264 Write 250 Mixed 235 SusWrite 236 56% 246 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 49.3 162% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 134%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 52GB free Firmware: VT10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 60 59 57 59 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 46.5 Write 54 Mixed 36.7 SusWrite 58.9 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 38%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC4H SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 171 174 173 156 174 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 192 Write 124 Mixed 81.8 SusWrite 170 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 165GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 17 Write 28.5 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 28.7 38% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Kingston 99U5471-058.A00LF Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.9% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.8 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	334x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	219x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	179x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	83x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	71x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	43x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	35x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	23x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	21x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 50%, 23,732 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16