Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 18:51
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 620
61% 498 Pts
64-Core 846
52% 846 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
42GB free
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 119 122 84 70 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 459
Write 132
Mixed 131
SusWrite 98
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 19.5
103% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 319
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 47.6
81% 164 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 73%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 67 62 59 52 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 62.5
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 58.6
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 51%
Intenso Speed Line 64GB
31GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 27.5
Write 20.2
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 22
33% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1.6
409% 5.4 MB/s
DQ Read 6.9
DQ Write 0
DQ Mixed 7.4
277% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$34
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback