Dell Latitude E5430 non-vPro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive3.52% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E5430 non-vPro  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0MYF02
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140113
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 14:58
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 81
2-Core 146
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 194
27% 198 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 053C) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.72% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 2.97
3% 4.21 fps
MRender 4.24
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.09
4% 4.92 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.72%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000BPKT-75PK4 500GB
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 20 21 21 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Read 48
Write 21.3
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 19.7
6% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
1% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KFYHV1-HYC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.1% Below average
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5430 non-vPro Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5430 non-vPro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback