HP 635 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 635 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 357A
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '21 at 19:07
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II P360
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 35
2-Core 48.7
36% 50 Pts
4-Core 69
8-Core 69.8
9% 69.4 Pts
64-Core 69.3
4% 69.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6370M
HP(103C 357A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.861.1.2000
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Emtec X150 120GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 108 117 114 96 60 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 151
Write 122
Mixed 124
SusWrite 97.8
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 17.9
65% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 96.1
73% 99.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KFYHV1-HYC 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 5.1
MC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.73 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD02F1
Typical 635 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 635 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $113
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback