HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory9.4 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 28 '20 at 10:07
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 65.5
2-Core 135
52% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 566
49% 417 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.1% Very good
Lighting 109
Reflection 100
Parallax 102
89% 104 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 106
Splatting 0.09
57% 80.5 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$38
786GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 110 107 65 76 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 136
Write 134
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 88.7
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
813GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 97 100 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 78.1
Write 70
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 99.2
49% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 108 111 109 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 101
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 109
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 67%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$38
243GB free
Firmware: 12.V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 83 79 78 83 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 89.7
Write 76.5
Mixed 61.3
SusWrite 80.3
57% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
171% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
576GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 102
64% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 66%
Samsung D3 Station 6TB
738GB free, PID 6127
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 24.5
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 24.3
35% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
106% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.1% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 20.8
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback