PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B54h |
Memory | 9.4 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110311 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | Apr 28 '20 at 10:07 |
Run Duration | 197 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
Asus(1043 86F0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
78.1%
Very good
|
89% 104 fps
|
57% 80.5 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$38
786GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 110 107 65 76 109 MB/s
|
64.6%
Good
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
218% 1.6 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
813GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 99 97 100 100 99 MB/s
|
50.8%
Above average
|
49% 67.6 MB/s
|
85% 0.53 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 108 111 109 107 MB/s
|
59.4%
Above average
|
62% 84.7 MB/s
|
81% 0.5 MB/s
|
|
![]() |
48.9%
Average
|
57% 76.9 MB/s
|
171% 1.33 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
576GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 101 102 101 102 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
64% 88.2 MB/s
|
159% 1.07 MB/s
|
|
![]() Samsung D3 Station 6TB
738GB free, PID 6127
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 25 24 24 MB/s
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
35% 26.1 MB/s
|
106% 1.4 MB/s
|
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 298x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 277x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 257x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 148x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 125x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 100x |
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 54x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 69%, 5,700 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |