HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory9 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 26 '20 at 13:55
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 135
62% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 543
48% 406 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Asus(1043 03BA) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Lighting 27.4
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 24.4
22% 24.6 fps
MRender 20.6
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 28
20% 23.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
661GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 119 101 119 119 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 126
Write 118
Mixed 88.5
SusWrite 116
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 76%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
832GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 99 102 106 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 84.5
Mixed 26.3
SusWrite 104
55% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 53 56 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 49
Write 53.5
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 55.5
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30%
Great: 67%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$32
236GB free
Firmware: 12.V05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 77 79 86 79 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 63.7
Write 72.7
Mixed 44.5
SusWrite 80.3
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
576GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 101 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 97.7
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 99.8
64% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 66%
Samsung D3 Station 6TB
763GB free, PID 6127
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 31
Write 23.5
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 24
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
103% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F ID:02 FE EBJ21EE8BDFA-DJ-F 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 20.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.4
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback