Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive234% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 00:31
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 72.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 182
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 495
50% 406 Pts
64-Core 622
38% 622 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315
Nvidia(10DE 102F) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.59
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.41% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 2.08
Parallax 0.47
1% 1.39 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 1.63
Splatting 1.83
2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.41%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 771 787 734 595 608 614 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 2,418
Write 2,048
Mixed 1,512
SusWrite 685
371% 1,666 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 58.7
194% 63.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 545
DQ Mixed 740
562% 771 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 234%
Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 155 151 154 154 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 121
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 153
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 114%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID c82a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 5.5 5.5 5.7 5.9 5.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
2.58% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 5.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 5.4
8% 6.07 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.58%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,337 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $327
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback