Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 1,324 User benchmarks, average bench 75% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.8% Excellent	Memory 89.5 1-Core 95.1 2-Core 192 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 399 8-Core 693 66% 546 Pts	64-Core 1,007 62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 240GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 477 181 159 156 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	86.7% Excellent	Read 463 Write 474 Mixed 401 SusWrite 268 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 78 4K Mixed 36.4 127% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 305 223% 288 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.7% Great: 95%
Lexar JumpDrive P20 USB 3.0 32GB-$23 225 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 16GB free, PID a212 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 27 29 29 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 33.4 Write 28.7 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 25.4 38% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0- Hynix HMT31GR7EFR4C Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C Hynix HMT42GR7BFR4C 48GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 16384, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	101% Outstanding	MC Read 48.6 MC Write 35.6 MC Mixed 36.3 115% 40.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.1 39% 13.6 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 101%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	91x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16