Today's hottest deals

Asrock 990FX Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Killer  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 05 '18 at 15:42
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$95
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 146
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 408
41% 333 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB; N106F-5SDN-N5GS, INNO3D TWIN X2
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Lighting 86.6
Reflection 88.5
Parallax 82
70% 85.7 fps
MRender 84.1
Gravity 82.6
Splatting 85.8
69% 84.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 579
Write 385
Mixed 401
101% 455 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 19.2
109% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 42.8
DQ Write 55.6
DQ Mixed 19.3
23% 39.2 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 225
Write 189
Mixed 199
154% 204 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.21
85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 118%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
179GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 89.7
Write 71.1
Mixed 107
68% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.31
72% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%
Lexar JumpDrive P20 USB 3.0 32GB-$23
30GB free, PID a212
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70% Good
Read 293
Write 99.6
Mixed 113
178% 168 MB/s
4K Read 9.09
4K Write 1.18
4K Mixed 0.91
105% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 70%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 F3-17000CL9-4GBSR M378B5273DH0-CH9 F3-17000CL9-4GBSR 16GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.3% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.8
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Killer Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Killer - $154

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $439
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback