Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-V  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121011
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 24 '17 at 21:54
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2130-$50
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 158
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 225
29% 221 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 90GB-$96
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 392
Write 110
Mixed 154
47% 218 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 10.3
61% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 31.1
49% 94.4 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 78%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
41GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 115
Write 110
Mixed 8.32
56% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.17
70% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
32GB free
Firmware: MJAOA3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 116
Write 127
Mixed 6.94
60% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.13
28% 0.24 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 91%
HGST HTS 541010A9E680 1TB
800GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 25.8
Mixed 27.2
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.02
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
1% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 34%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 4.79
Mixed 5.79
8% 6.94 MB/s
4K Read 3.51
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
14% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback